See also:-
Setting up a cross-reference table in 08/2016 approach of Helen Mironchick when moving to a new line of the system of Boolean equations
in this post another case with triple predicates and much more complicated 08/2016 chart is considered.
Consider system of Boolean equations.
(1) F1(x1,y1)≡F2(x2,y2) =1
(2) F1(x2,y2)≡F2(x3,y3) =1Setting up a cross-reference table in 08/2016 approach of Helen Mironchick when moving to a new line of the system of Boolean equations
in this post another case with triple predicates and much more complicated 08/2016 chart is considered.
Consider system of Boolean equations.
(1) F1(x1,y1)≡F2(x2,y2) =1
. . . . . .
(7) F1(x7,y7)≡F2(x8,y8) =1
where F1 and F2 are double predicates
Denote card(N) the power of set N
Denote n1,n2,m1,m2,s1,s2
n1=card (falseSet_F2 ∩ falseSet_F1)
n2=card (falseSet_F2 ∩ truthSet_F1)
m1=card (truthSet_F2 ∩ falseSet_F1)
m2=card (truthSet_F2 ∩ truthSet_F1)
s1=card (falseSet_F1)
s2=card (truthSet_F1)
Then following 08.2016 diagram takes place
For instance consider system
(1) F1(x1,y1)=>F2(x2,y2) =1
(2) F1(x2,y2)=>F2(x3,y3) =1
. . . . . .
(7) F1(x7,y7)=>F2(x8,y8) =1
where F1 and F2 are double predicates
Then following 08.2016 diagram would take place
Another sample
(1) F1(x1,y1) v F2(x2,y2) =1
(2) F1(x2,y2) v F2(x3,y3) =1
. . . . . .
(7) F1(x7,y7) v F2(x8,y8) =1
where F1 and F2 are double predicates
Would I consider triple predicates instead of double it wouldn't change excel spreadsheets.
Core logic proposed in the very first rows keeps stay the same.
Now consider system from inform20190916proba2.pdf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cbfc/8cbfc3bad6df58363c66ed19cfc7aa3e0f7fe80d" alt=""
Fork 08.2016 diagram
No comments:
Post a Comment